Governance
Independence by design
Credible conformity assessment depends on the structural separation of commercial, assessment, decision and appeals functions.
I. Structural separations
Five boundaries that protect the assessment
AIHRI's governance separates functions that must not influence one another. The boundaries below are structural, not procedural preferences.
Function
Scheme ownership
Function
Certification operations
Separation rationale: The party that owns a certification scheme does not perform assessment or make certification decisions under that scheme.
Function
Commercial administration
Function
Technical judgement
Separation rationale: Contract, fee and client-relationship activities are structurally separated from assessment findings and conformity conclusions.
Function
Assessment
Function
Certification decision
Separation rationale: Personnel who gather and evaluate evidence do not decide whether certification is granted, maintained, reduced, suspended or withdrawn for the same case.
Function
Certification decision
Function
Appeals review
Separation rationale: Appeals against a certification decision are handled by personnel independent of the original decision and of the assessment team.
Function
Public communications
Function
Confidential certification records
Separation rationale: This public website is separated from operational systems that hold applicant, assessment and certification information.
II. Impartiality
Identify, record, evaluate, mitigate, monitor
Actual, potential and perceived conflicts of interest are identified, recorded, evaluated, mitigated and monitored across the assessment, decision and appeals functions.
Specific impartiality mechanisms will be published as they are formally established.
- Declarations of interest
- Personnel and panellists declare relevant interests before engagement and on a continuing basis.
- Recusal
- Individuals with a conflict for a specific case are excluded from the affected assessment, decision or appeal.
- Role segregation
- Assessment, decision and appeals responsibilities are held by different personnel for the same case.
- Independent oversight
- Impartiality is monitored through mechanisms structurally independent of commercial functions.
- Competence-based allocation
- Cases are allocated to personnel authorised for the relevant scope, not on the basis of commercial relationship.
- Prohibition of undue influence
- Attempts to influence assessment findings or certification decisions are prohibited and, where identified, recorded and addressed.
III. Consultancy boundary
Assessment is not advice
AIHRI does not provide implementation or certification consultancy to organisations where that work would compromise its impartiality as a conformity assessment body.
AIHRI assesses and verifies. It does not design an organisation's management system, draft its evidence or coach it towards a favourable certification outcome.
IV. Competence and authorisation
Authorised for defined roles and scopes
Personnel involved in assessment, review, decision and appeal functions are authorised for defined roles and scopes on the basis of documented evidence, training, evaluation and monitored performance.
Personnel are authorised for defined roles and scopes on the basis of documented evidence.
Authorisation reflects education, training, assessment experience and evaluated performance.
Qualifications and years of experience alone do not automatically establish competence.
Authorisation is maintained through monitored performance and periodic re-evaluation.
V. Decision integrity
Independent of the assessment team
Certification decisions are made by competent personnel who are independent of the assessment team for the same case. Decisions are based on the complete certification record and the defined requirements of the applicable scheme.
A decision-maker cannot alter assessment findings; the assessment team cannot decide the outcome of its own case.
VI. Complaints and appeals
Independent, confidential, without retaliation
Complaints about AIHRI's conduct and appeals against certification decisions are handled independently of the original case. Detailed procedures, timelines and any fee arrangements will be published when the corresponding AIHRI procedure has been formally approved.
- Independent handling
- Appeals against certification decisions are handled by personnel independent of the original decision and of the assessment team.
- No retaliation
- Submission of a complaint or appeal does not result in adverse treatment of the submitter.
- Confidentiality
- Complaint and appeal information is handled with defined confidentiality controls and disclosed only where necessary.
- Separation from the original case
- Records, personnel and communications for a complaint or appeal are kept separate from those of the underlying assessment.
VII. Confidentiality and records
Controlled access, traceable records
Information obtained in the course of assessment is protected and used only for the purposes for which it was provided. Retention periods will be published when AIHRI's own approved retention schedule is in place.
- Need-to-know access
- Access to information is limited to personnel with a defined role in the case or activity.
- Secure systems
- Operational systems that hold assessment and certification records are separated from the public website and protected by access controls.
- Version control
- Documented information carries reference and version identifiers to support integrity and traceability.
- Record integrity
- Records are protected against unauthorised alteration and loss for the period they are retained.
- Traceability
- Assessment and decision records are structured so that conclusions can be traced to evidence and defined requirements.
- Lawful disclosure
- Information is disclosed only where required by law or with defined authorisation.
VIII. Non-discrimination and access
Fair and consistent access within scope
Access to AIHRI's certification activities is intended to be fair, consistent and based on scope, competence and defined eligibility. Access does not depend on the size of the applicant organisation, its market position or its commercial relationship with AIHRI.
Where an engagement cannot be accepted, the reason is documented and communicated to the applicant.
IX. Governance structure
Published as each role is confirmed
This register will list AIHRI's governing body, technical management, impartiality mechanism, certification decision function, appeals function and data-protection responsibility as each is formally established.
Readiness note
AIHRI is establishing its governance structure. Roles and holders will be published on this page as each appointment is formally approved. Unconfirmed roles are not shown.
X. Public policies
Controlled documents, published on approval
Approved public policies will be listed with reference, version, approval date, effective date and review date. Draft and internal documents are not published.
Readiness note
Approved public policies will be listed here with their reference, version and dates. Draft and internal documents are not published.
Related
How independence appears in the assessment lifecycle
See how assessment, independent technical review, certification decision and appeals are separated within a single case.
Assessment ModelContact
Governance enquiries
For enquiries about impartiality, complaints or appeals, use the general contact route until the dedicated procedures are published.
Contact